The New York Occasions is out with a tale suggesting that scientific journals supply nowhere close to the type of scrutiny vital for papers on most cancers analysis. The newspaper experiences {that a} best most cancers surgeon at Columbia College is underneath scrutiny after 26 of Dr. Sam Yoon’s revealed research have been flagged for suspicious information, together with photographs of most cancers cells, mice, and tumors that seem to have been repurposed for various research. One revealed learn about on abdomen most cancers used to be “quietly” withdrawn after doubts surfaced, and any other scientific magazine just lately retracted a Yoon learn about after inquiries from the newspaper. Memorial Sloan Kettering in New York Town, the place a lot of the analysis used to be carried out, has opened an investigation.
The preliminary suspicions on Yoon’s papers have been raised through a “British medical sleuth” named Dr. Sholto David in a weblog submit and science discussion board, according to the Occasions. Yoon isn’t commenting, neither is a junior collaborator. The tale main points the research in query through Yoon but in addition raises broader issues concerning the evaluation procedure for analysis publications. “The journals do the naked minimal,” microbiologist Elisabeth Bik tells the Occasions. “There is not any oversight.” Learn the whole tale, which notes that sleuths are the use of AI-powered gear of their quest to discover different questionable analysis. (A Harvard professor may be in bother over alleged falsified information.)
