Nineteen contributors of Congress are pushing Mark Zuckerberg to give an explanation for why Meta has allowed advertisements for cocaine, ecstasy and different medicine to be proven on Fb and Instagram. The letter comes after the Tech Transparency Challenge (TTP) exposed masses of such advertisements at the corporate’s platform.The letter issues to the TTP’s record closing month, which used Meta’s advert library to seek out 450 Instagram and Fb advertisements “promoting an array of pharmaceutical and different medicine.” A lot of the ones advertisements integrated “pictures of prescription drug bottles, piles of tablets and powders, or bricks of cocaine,” and directed audience to out of doors apps like Telegram. Since then, the TTP has been posting further examples of such advertisements on X, together with one it discovered the previous day.“Meta seems to have endured to shirk its social accountability and defy its personal group pointers,” the lawmakers write within the letter, which is addressed at once to Zuckerberg. “What is especially egregious about this example is this used to be no longer person generated content material at the darkish internet or on personal social media pages, however somewhat they had been commercials authorized and monetized by way of Meta. Many of those advertisements contained blatant references to unlawful medicine of their titles, descriptions, pictures, and advertiser account names, which have been simply discovered by way of the researchers and reporters on the Wall Boulevard Magazine and Tech Transparency Challenge the usage of Meta’s Advert Library. Then again, they seem to have handed undetected or been overlooked by way of Meta’s personal inner processes.”The letter requests information about Meta’s insurance policies for implementing laws in opposition to drug-related advertisements, in addition to details about how repeatedly the reported advertisements had been considered and interacted with. It offers Meta a time limit of September 6 to respond. A spokesperson for Meta mentioned the corporate plans to answer the letter and directed Engadget to a previous remark, revealed by way of The Wall Boulevard Magazine, through which the corporate mentioned it rejects “masses of 1000’s of advertisements for violating our drug insurance policies.”This newsletter comprises associate hyperlinks; in case you click on any such hyperlink and make a purchase order, we would possibly earn a fee.
 "Bashar al-Assad’s spouse recordsdata for divorce, expresses dissatisfaction together with her existence in Russia: Document")
