A couple of weeks in the past, we when compared Intel’s new Core Extremely 9 285K towards AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D in 45 video games to look how the 2 evaluate in lots of titles. The outcome was once a one-sided defeat, with the 9800X3D providing 24% extra efficiency on reasonable. This isn’t just right for Intel and it’s not a just right end result for the ones hoping to shop for considered one of their new Arrow Lake CPUs for gaming. From that comparability, it was once transparent that spending round $630 on an Extremely 9 285K for gaming is a foul concept, particularly at this level. Since then, we have additionally when compared the 9800X3D with the Core i9-14900K in 45 video games. Whilst the i9 struggled, the Zen 5-based three-D V-Cache part was once, on reasonable, 18% sooner.
However all this trying out made us marvel: how do the 285K and 14900K evaluate in such quite a lot of video games? Whilst we have already famous that this comparability is not vital (as players should not be taking a look at a Core i9 or Core Extremely 9 processor), we are curious to look how they evaluate. There are two major issues we wish to reach right here. First, does the 6% margin favoring the 14900K over the 285K, which we noticed in our one-day evaluate, translate to the primary benchmarks and 45 video games? 2d, we wish to arrange a base recreation of 285K for various video games, which can be utilized to observe the growth of every replace.
Even if we’ve already executed a evaluate of the 9800X3D, Intel to start with mentioned that there’s a distinction between the 285K and the 14900K. They fit neatly, even supposing in at some point’s research, we noticed a large number of variation in efficiency on either side. It’ll be fascinating to look how they evaluate within the larger recreation. Take a look at Setup For trying out, all CPU recreation benchmarks can be carried out at 1080p the use of GeForce RTX 4090. If you wish to know why that is the easiest way to guage CPU efficiency in video games nowadays and someday, see the detailed rationalization. The 14900K has been examined the use of historic reminiscence with DDR5-7200 reminiscence, whilst the 285K was once paired with DDR5-8200 reminiscence, particularly the more recent CUDIMM fashions. There was once a large number of confusion surrounding this matter, and many of us did not notice that the DDR5-8200 reminiscence we hooked up to the Arrow Lake CPUs in our day one critiques was once in reality CUDIMM reminiscence. Some say that if we used CUDIMM reminiscence, those new Intel CPUs would carry out higher, however that isn’t the case. Technically talking, should you run CUDIMM and UDIMM reminiscence continuously and on the identical time, the effects would be the identical. CPU Motherboard Reminiscence AMD Ryzen 7000 Sequence Gigabyte X670E Aorus Grasp [BIOS F33d]
G.Talent Trident Z5 RGB
32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-38-38-96
Home windows 11 24H2 AMD Ryzen 5000 Sequence MSI MPG X570S Carbon MAX WiFi [BIOS 7D52v19]
G.Talent Ripjaws V Sequence
32GB DDR4-3600 CL14-15-15-35
Home windows 11 24H2 Intel Core Extremely 200S Asus ROG Maximus Z890 Hero [BIOS 0805]
G.Talent Trident Z5
CK 32GB DDR5-8200 CL40-52-52-131
Home windows 11 23H2 [24H2 = Slower]
Intel twelfth, thirteenth & 14th MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi [BIOS 7D89v1E]
G.Talent Trident Z5 RGB
32GB DDR5-7200 CL34-45-45-115
Home windows 11 24H2 Graphics Card Energy Provide Garage Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 OC Version Kolink Regulator Gold ATX 3.0 1200W TeamGroup T-Pressure Cardea A440 M.2 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD 4TB GeForce Recreation Able Motive force 565.90 with reminiscence get entry to WHCUDIQMM and reminiscence get entry to WHCUDIQMM simple to succeed in prime frequency to be able to take care of balance. Due to this fact, whilst CUDIMM reminiscence must permit upper speeds, if all sorts of reminiscence can reach the similar frequency and feature the similar timing, the efficiency would be the identical. In the end, we’re the use of CUDIMM reminiscence and feature executed so since we examined Arrow Lake. Now, let’s dive into the information… Benchmarks The Ultimate of Us, Cyberpunk, Hogwarts Legacy, ACC, Spider-Guy As we noticed in our one-day evaluate, the 285K is doing strangely neatly in The Ultimate of Us Phase 1, the place it belongs. 17% sooner than 14900K in body fee comparability. Sadly, the effects are exterior, as a result of we discover that it’s 8% slower in Cyberpunk, 4% slower in Hogwarts Legacy, and eight% slower in ACC. We see a small alternate for Spider-Guy, with a 7% building up on this instance.
Baldur’s Gate 3, Homeworld 3, APTR, Flight Simulator, Starfield Subsequent, we’ve Baldur’s Gate 3, the place 285K is 6% slower. It is not an enormous limitation, however any drop in efficiency with the brand new technology is regarding. It is usually 3% slower in Homeworld 3, however it is a 17% loss in A Plague Story: Necessities that looks, 1% down by means of 32%. Thankfully, the capability stays the similar in Microsoft Flight Simulator and Starfield. Even if it’s not commonplace, we don’t see any go back in those examples.
Horizon Forbidden West, Horizon 0 Morning time, Watch Canines, A long way Cry 6, T&L For Horizon Forbidden West, the 285K was once 7% sooner than the 14900K, a unprecedented improve. Sadly, it was once 10% slower in Horizon 0 Morning time. It was once additionally 12% slower in Watch Canines: Legion, 12% slower in A long way Cry 6, and three% slower in Recreation of Thrones and Freedom.
Hitman 3, Callisto Protocol, SoTR, Halo, Warhammer 3 The following batch of video games display aggressive effects, that means the 285K can stay alongside of the former technology model. The 14900K was once moderately sooner in Hitman 3, but it surely was once 14% sooner in The Callisto Protocol. Then we’ve a tie in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, a slight 7% win for 14900K in Halo Endless, and a an identical lead to Warhammer III.
Black Ops 6, Borderlands 3, Riftbreaker, Remnant 2, SWJS Then, in Name of Responsibility: Black Ops 6, 14900K and 285K have been neck and neck, reaching 296 fps. 285K was once 4% slower in Borderlands 3 and 13% slower in The Riftbreaker. Then we’ve Remnant II, the place efficiency was once nearly the similar, adopted by means of Superstar Wars Jedi: Survivor, the place 285K was once 5% decrease.
Struggle Thunder, Cranium and Bones, Go back, Ratchet & Clank, Death Mild 2 285K does no longer fare neatly in Struggle Thunder, coming in 19% slower than 14900K, but it surely was once 6% sooner in Cranium and Bones. There was once an identical efficiency in Returnal and Ratchet & Clank: Rift Aside, adopted by means of a 6% loss in Death Mild 2.
Forza Horizon 5, Forza Motorsport, Gears 5, Ghost of Tsushima, Hunt Within the following effects, 285K was once less than 14900K in all 5 samples. It was once 4% slower in Forza Horizon 5, however 17% slower in Forza Motorsport and 13% slower in Gears 5. Ghost of Tsushima had blended effects: 285K was once 2% slower in viewing ‘ana body fee, however 9% sooner than 1% decrease. Sadly, the 1% energy drop did not proceed in Hunt: Showdown, the place the hit fee dropped by means of 3%, and the bottom 1% fee dropped a whopping 22%.
International Struggle Z, F1 24, Rainbow Six Siege, Counter-Strike 2, Fortnite Our following effects display similarities: 285K was once 6% slower in International Struggle Z, 5% slower in F1 24, 6% slower Rainbow Six Siege, and it did the similar in Counter-Strike 2. Then, we’ve Fortnite, which sadly nonetheless does not paintings at the new Arrow Lake CPUs. The sport freezes and freezes all of the gadget because of a topic associated with Simple Anti-Cheat. Intel is acutely aware of the problem, however a repair has no longer but been issued.
Murderer’s Creed x2, Area Marine 2, SW Outlaws, Dragon Age: The Veilguard In the end, within the ultimate 5 video games examined, 285K is right kind, moderately lower than 14900K. For instance, it was once 5% slower in Murderer’s Creed Mirage, 1% slower in Valhalla (even supposing the decrease 1% was once deficient), and the most efficient effects have been in Area Marine 2, the place the efficiency was once the similar. Then we noticed a 6% loss in Superstar Wars Outlaws to a fifteen% loss in Dragon Age.
45 Reasonable Gaming In our one-day check, the 14900K was once 6% sooner on reasonable, even supposing the typical was once calculated otherwise the use of the geometric imply. The purpose is, the 14900K continues to be rapid, 5% over the 45-game pattern, with a number of vital effects and only a few samples the place the 285K is in point of fact rapid.
The most efficient rating of 285K was once in The Ultimate of Us Phase 1, however out of doors of that, there is not a lot to indicate to. In the meantime, the 14900K was once sooner by means of double digits in 9 of the video games examined, with 20% or extra in 3 of them. What We Realized So, there you could have it – confirming what we discovered after we examined the Core Extremely 285K for the primary time. It is about 5% slower than the 14900K in video games, however infrequently, it may be a lot slower than that. On the subject of total gaming, the 285K sits between the 12900K and 14900K, which is a great end result bearing in mind the ability it makes use of when put next. Alternatively, the lower in efficiency from the former technology isn’t one thing that customers like to look, despite the fact that there may be some huge cash on be offering. On this explicit instance, the alternate in energy intake is essential, bearing in mind that AMD is providing higher video games whilst the use of much less energy.
In those other video games, the 9800X3D is eighteen% sooner than the 14900K and 24% sooner than the 285K, which places Intel in a robust place presently. My hope is that Intel can ship on their promise of luck with Arrow Lake, which must be delivered this month. We need to wait and spot what occurs. If they may be able to fit the 14900K video games, this may assist, since the efficiency and tool intake can be sturdy. Alternatively, to ensure that portions just like the 285K to be a good selection, Intel wishes to deal with gaming efficiency and complexity. Additionally they need to stay the cost down – $630 is just too prime for what the Core Extremely 9 provides.
That mentioned, we are not certain Intel desires to promote this many processors. They do not appear to have produced a lot, and dietary supplements were non-existent, particularly in the USA, which is unusual as a result of call for is so low. In Australia, it’s simple to shop for 285K, as many sellers have inventory. I am not shocked, despite the fact that, bearing in mind the asking worth is $1,100 AUD, whilst the 9950X, for instance, prices $970 – so much inexpensive. We would love to reiterate that 285K is benchmarked the use of CUDIMM reminiscence, so we are trying out Arrow Lake at its easiest exterior configuration. As for CUDIMM reminiscence, it is not Arrow Lake’s silver bullet – it does not building up efficiency over common reminiscence. If truth be told, as we’ve already observed, given the similar frequency and period, it does no longer building up efficiency in any respect. It is more than likely a just right factor, as a result of they’re laborious to seek out and really dear.
Maximum DDR5-8000 kits price north of $300, which is ridiculous. Alternatively, we’ve observed 8200 gadgets that experience the similar velocity because the gadgets we use in trying out for simply shy of $200, which continues to be dear, however greater than $300. Through comparability, the reminiscence we used to check the 9800X3D prices $110 for a 32GB equipment. If you are going to purchase an Arrow Lake CPU, our recommendation is to get the DDR5-7200 CL34 equipment for round $120. Efficiency is on par with costlier 8200 CUDIMM gadgets for the cost. That is for this evaluate. We plan to renew this trying out once Intel releases their repair. Shortcuts to buy:
