The Joint Investigation Headquarters — a cooperative investigative frame involving the prosecution, police, and the Corruption Investigation Place of business for Prime-ranking Officers (CIO) — has despatched an reputable summons to President Yoon Suk Yeol, who faces fees of being the “ringleader of a insurrection.”
This comes after the prosecution had already asked his look. Since Yoon’s impeachment movement used to be handed by way of the Nationwide Meeting on December 14, postponing his presidential tasks, prosecutors, police, and the CIO have all been vying to summon him for wondering.
On December 16, the Prosecution’s Particular Investigation Headquarters for Martial Regulation (led by way of Leader Prosecutor Park Se Hyun) introduced that it had issued a 2d summons to President Yoon. As with the primary summons, the prosecution cited fees of “the ringleader of a insurrection” and “abuse of energy and obstruction of the workout of rights” underneath the Prison Act. Yoon used to be requested to seem on the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Place of business at 10 AM on December 21. The summons used to be delivered by the use of each electronic mail and mail.
In the past, on December 11, prosecutors despatched Yoon a summons to seem on December 15. Alternatively, Yoon’s criminal workforce refused, bringing up the unfinished composition of his protection recommend. This brought on the prosecution to factor a 2d call for for his look.
The prosecution has reportedly warned that if Yoon continues to defy the summons with out legit justification, it’s going to search a warrant for his arrest and pursue pressured investigation measures. At the similar day, the prosecution arrested two key army figures: Kwak Jong Geun, the commander of the Particular Battle Command, and Lee Jin Woo, the commander of the Capital Protection Command. Each figures had been concerned within the arguable deployment of troops to the Nationwide Meeting at the day martial regulation used to be declared. With the detainment of key army officers like former Protection Minister Kim Yong Hyun and Protection Safety Command Leader Yeo In Hyung, the prosecution now sees an immediate investigation of Yoon as very important.
The Joint Investigation Headquarters additionally issued a summons to Yoon, asking him to seem on the CIO place of job at 10 AM on December 18. The police, who had at first been investigating Yoon’s insurrection fees, passed over the case to the CIO, who then knowledgeable Yoon of the semblance date. The CIO could also be investigating former Protection Minister Kim Yong Hyun, former Minister of Public Management and Safety Lee Sang Min, former Military Leader of Personnel Park An Su (who additionally served because the commander of martial regulation), and Protection Safety Command Leader Yeo In Hyung — all of whom had been charged with insurrection along Yoon.
Because the Prosecution’s Particular Investigation Headquarters and the Joint Investigation Headquarters each asked Yoon’s look, consideration is involved in the place Yoon will in the long run seem for wondering. The time period “discussion board buying groceries” — in most cases carried out in criminal lawsuits — has been used to explain Yoon’s distinctive place, as he can technically make a selection which investigative frame to stand. Yoon might go for a unmarried, consolidated investigation consultation, probably settling on a venue that he perceives as extra favorable to his case.
In the meantime, some on Yoon’s facet argue that the president’s declaration of martial regulation will have to now not be matter to judicial evaluate, suggesting that he might refuse to conform to any of the summons. If he continues to defy the requests for wondering, government might search a court-issued arrest warrant.
Criminal professionals have famous that Yoon’s refusal to conform to the investigation may supply an extra foundation for his elimination from place of job. The precedent is apparent. Relating to former President Park Geun Hye, who confronted impeachment in 2017, the Constitutional Courtroom criticized her loss of cooperation with the prosecution and the particular investigation workforce. In its impeachment ruling, the court docket said, “President Park failed to satisfy her promise to the general public and confirmed no transparent intent to uphold the Charter.”
Yoon himself had in the past vowed to “take complete criminal and political accountability in regards to the martial regulation declaration.” If he fails to cooperate with the investigation, it may well be observed as a repeat of Park Geun-hye’s movements.
Yoon is recently forming a criminal protection workforce led by way of Kim Hong Il, a former chairman of the Korea Communications Fee, and is actively discussing conceivable methods to reply to the continued investigation.
SEE ALSO: New analysis presentations Korean youngsters are probably the most overweight in East Asia
