This newsletter has been reviewed in step with Science X’s editorial procedure
and insurance policies.
Editors have highlighted the next attributes whilst making sure the content material’s credibility:
fact-checked
depended on supply
proofread
Adequate!
Credit score: AI-generated symbol
× shut
Credit score: AI-generated symbol
The editors on the magazine Frontiers in Cellular and Developmental Biology have retracted a paper after it was once identified to them via readers that supporting pictures have been generated improperly via an AI symbol generator. Of their retraction, the editors file that the cause of the retraction was once that “considerations had been raised in regards to the nature of its AI-generated figures.”
Within the article, which concerned analysis surrounding stem cells in small mammals, the authors incorporated pictures depicting rat anatomy that an AI machine had obviously created. In a single image, a unmarried rat seemed to have a penis and testicles that had been higher than the remainder of its frame—now not one thing that happens in nature. One of the vital accompanying textual content was once additionally incomprehensible. Any other symbol confirmed a rat mobile that didn’t resemble the real construction of a rat mobile.
The disproportioned pictures within the paper are most probably so as to add to ongoing discussions within the science group surrounding the usage of AI in producing textual content or imagery to be used in technical papers—specifically the ones printed in established journals.
On this case, it isn’t transparent how such problematic pictures wound up in a peer-reviewed magazine. The authors, a mixed workforce from Hong Hui Health center and Jiaotong College in China, didn’t attempt to disguise the truth that they’d used AI to create the pictures; they even credited Midjourney.
Some within the press have famous that Frontiers has a coverage that permits for the usage of AI-generated fabrics so long as their use is disclosed, which was once the case on this example. However the coverage additionally notes that makes an attempt will have to be made to fact-check anything else produced via such programs, which obviously was once now not the case on this mix-up.
The editors at Frontiers first of all posted a observe at the paper claiming that the thing have been corrected and {that a} new model could be printed in brief order. Now not a lot later, the paper was once retracted.
The errors made via the authors of the paper and the workforce on the magazine that authorized its e-newsletter usually are the primary of many to come back, regardless that it’s nonetheless now not transparent what adjustments might be required to stop such errors from taking place at some point.
Additional information:
Retraction: Cell purposes of spermatogonial stem cells relating to JAK/STAT signaling pathway, Frontiers in Cellular and Developmental Biology (2024). DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1386861
© 2024 Science X Community
