Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II vs Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Huge attitude lenses make up one 3rd of the 'Holy Trinity' of lenses and are helpful for quite a few functions, together with panorama, structure and astronomy. Most often, a regular 24-70mm lens isn't huge sufficient to shoot a selected scene, so having a wide-angle lens for your bag lets you fill the 24mm hole. Huge-angle lenses are common for aerial pictures as a result of they take in extra space and let in additional mild than telephoto lenses (which, when taking pictures at the hours of darkness, is essential). Usually, high lenses are thought to be the most efficient lenses for astronomy as a result of their huge box of view, however you’ll use one of the most best possible lenses at f/2.8 to get the most efficient pictures of the sky. On the other hand, the good thing about the usage of a telephoto lens over a major lens is the versatility of fixing the focal period to shoot other types. The Sony vs Canon debate continues, and in any case, it frequently comes down in your desire. On the other hand, we can be specializing in the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II and the Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM, evaluating their specs and the way we discovered their efficiency once we examined them each. You probably have already purchased in any device, then the selection might be clean, however for customers who wish to use their first digital camera device and lenses or are considering of fixing from some other logo, stay studying to look how this works. two mirrors examine to one another.
Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II Sony's 'holy trinity' zoom has stepped forward on what was once already a very good lens. , and make it higher. it’s a must to purchase from any Sony digital camera. Learn extra under

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM The Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM lens is loopy and makes astro pictures made clean because of its easy design and 5 fastened symbol positions. Learn extra under SpecificationsSwitch to scroll horizontallyHeader Cellular – Colum 0 Sony FE FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM IICanon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMDate first launched September 2023August 2019RRP at liberate $2299.99999 16- 35mm15-35mmApertureConstant f/2.8Constant f /2.8Lens mount Sony ECanon RFI symbol stabilizationNone5 stops same old, as much as 8 stops with Canon RF digital camera bodyAperture ringYesNoMinimum focusing distance0.73 feet / 0.2m3Mag0.0.22m2mg0. 21xAperture pages119 Fluepem8mmm82methereyeyeyunsiught 1 lb 3,8,5g1.85-inches / 87 for its top. Each lenses have a set aperture of f/2.8. Each lenses have an 82mm clear out thread. Each lenses are climate sealed. Not like Canon and 4 years older than the Sony. The Sony is 21.9mm brief and 293g. lighter than Canon. The Canon has an additional millimeter of focal period at its huge finish. Sony has 11 apertures, Canon has 9. Causes to shop for SonyImage 1 of three.The Sony is smaller and lighter than the Canon lens, which is a commute dream. (Photograph credit score: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Symbol credit score: Kimberley Lane) In September 2023, Sony re-released their 16-35mm f/2.8 GM with many updates and inventions. The unique model got here out already in 2017, so it took a very long time for the Mark II beef up. When paired with one of the most best possible mirrorless cameras in the market, this lens is a power to be reckoned with. One of the crucial best possible visible qualities {that a} Sony lens has over a Canon is the dimensions and weight distinction. The Sony is 35% lighter than the Canon with a weight distinction of 293g, and it's 21.9mm shorter, making it comfy to make use of for lengthy classes of time with out taking a toll at the arm or neck. And should you're touring or wearing it as a part of a big pair of glasses, the whole weight of your whole equipment provides up, so having lighter glasses could be very helpful. In our complete assessment of the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II, we stated we have been stunned by means of how mild this lens is. The Sony lens is 16.5% shorter than the Canon. (Symbol credit score: Sony, Canon, Getty) We additionally truly appreciated the addition of the aperture ring at the lens. This turns out to be useful in case you are the usage of a digital camera that most effective has two dials. You’ll be able to set it to ISO and shutter velocity after which alter the aperture at the lens itself. This prevents you from losing time going via menus when you wish to have to temporarily trade settings. The Sony additionally has extra aperture blades than the Canon, because of this rounder and smoother bokeh. It additionally has a shorter focal period and better magnification, which permits for higher close-up pictures. We have been very inspired with its efficiency – all our pictures have been very sharp and targeted once we attempted other apertures at longer distances. We most effective spotted a slight lower in nook sharpness when the usage of the decrease apertures (which is to be anticipated). Symbol 1 of 8We have been inspired by means of his astronomical point of view. (Photograph credit score: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph: Kimberley Lane)(Photograph credit score: Kimberley Lane) We idea it captured the ambience really well and we didn't realize any blurring or stuttering within the pictures. Devoted superstar shooters can opt for a higher-end lens, however for many informal photographers, we expect the Sony FE 16.35mm f/2.8 GM II will do the trick. We didn't come with it in our best possible astro focal point lenses as a result of in relation to wide-angle lenses, we expect the Sony FE 12-24mm f/2.8 GM is most likely the most efficient for astro taking pictures – even if it's a little extra. pricey. Causes to shop for CanonImage 1 of 6We appreciated Canon's easy and easy-to-use design. (Photograph credit score: Jase Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph: Jason Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph: Jason Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph: Jason Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph: Jason Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph credit score: Jason Parnell-Brookes) Evaluating the 2 lenses, the Canon lens has 3 key benefits over the Sony, however how important that distinction is is dependent upon your setup and elegance. The primary is that Canon has 5 same old symbol stops as much as 8 when mixed with a suitable Canon digital camera. Against this, the Sony lens has no symbol stabilization in any respect. We will be able to perceive why, because it's a dear lens already and maximum Sony cameras have in-body symbol stabilization, however 9 instances out of ten, it's great to have symbol stabilization within the lens as neatly, particularly while you're performed the usage of the digital camera. a physique that has no symbol steadiness. In the event you do a large number of video or hand held pictures and symbol stabilization is essential to you, a Canon lens might be the most suitable option right here. Symbol 1 of twoThe Canon lens works fantastically for aerial pictures. (Photograph credit score: Jason Parnell-Brookes)(Photograph credit score: Jason Parnell-Brookes)Throughout our Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM assessment, we appreciated its graceful and easy design, which is helping with portability, even if it's larger and heavier than the Sony. We predict the Canon is “prettier” than the Sony, however that's simply our opinion. Some other good thing about the Canon is the period of greater than 1mm on the finish. This will not be noticeable as a rule, however it may be helpful in aerial pictures the place you want to let in as a lot mild as conceivable. The use of the guideline of 500, this additional 1mm implies that you’ll set your shutter velocity for a couple of seconds greater than with Sony. In any case, Canon could also be a little bit less expensive. That's no longer an enormous value distinction, however we don't know any person who would flip down the risk to save lots of $200. It sort of feels to have stood the take a look at of time and maintained its price really well, a testomony to its general high quality and function even after greater than 4 years. We named the Canon RF the most efficient lens in our best possible information to astronomical lenses, so it's a little dear, however we expect it's well worth the cash.VerdictSwipe to scroll acrossAnd the winner is…Winner2nd placeSony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM IICanon RF 15- 35mm f/2.8L IS USM between two particular lenses and no longer the most efficient battle because of age distinction. We predict if Canon had launched their 15-35mm f/2.8 lens concurrently Sony's 16.35mm f/2.8 they usually will have shaved some weight and stepped forward the specifications in step with Sony, the outcome would had been higher. I will have long past the opposite direction. Who knows-maybe Canon will pop out with a Mark II someday. Even if Canon has some notable benefits over Sony, Sony's lens has many benefits over Canon's in relation to general efficiency and day by day use.

Author: OpenAI