Kyiv, Ukraine CNN —
Ukraine’s well-liked army leader Valery Zaluzhny was summoned for a meeting at the president’s office on Monday and informed of his dismissal, according to two sources familiar with the matter who spoke to CNN, following weeks of increasing speculation about tensions between Volodymyr Zelensky and his top commander.
An official announcement has not been made, so Zaluzhny was still in his position as of Wednesday evening. However, one of the sources told CNN that a presidential decree is anticipated by the end of the week, marking the most significant military shakeup by Zelensky since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion almost two years ago.
Speculation about the meeting and Zaluzhny’s dismissal spread rapidly across Kyiv on Monday evening, adding credibility to the widely understood rift between the president and his commander-in-chief following the failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive last year.
Tensions are said to have escalated particularly when Zaluzhny characterized the war with Russia as a stalemate in an interview and essay with The Economist magazine in November.
On Monday, presidential spokesman Serhiy Nykyforov told CNN and others that rumors of the army chief’s dismissal were false. The defense ministry also issued a statement on its social media platforms asserting, “Dear journalists, an immediate answer to everyone: No, this is not true.”
And in his daily evening address on Monday, Zelensky made no mention of his army chief.
However, according to one of the sources, at a small gathering at his office on Monday, also attended by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, the president declared that he had “made a decision to dismiss the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.”
In a described as “calm” conversation, Zelensky then offered Zaluzhny a different position, which Zaluzhny declined.
The president then emphasized his decision, stating that the fact Zaluzhny had turned down the new role did not change the fact that he was being removed from his current post.
CNN contacted the president’s office on Wednesday requesting further comment but did not receive a response.
Two names in particular are being discussed as potential successors, according to one of the sources, a senior military commander, who spoke to CNN.
One of them is the current head of the Defense Intelligence Directorate, Kyrylo Budanov, a 38-year-old general known to have strong ties with Zelensky and seen as representing a new generation of military leaders.
Asked by CNN in an interview on Tuesday whether he was set to become Ukraine’s new commander-in-chief, Budanov dismissed it, suggesting it was improbable for him to be speaking to CNN at that moment if such an appointment had just been made.
“We are in a war, and all sides are using all available means, including information warfare,” the military spy chief added.
The other front-runner is Oleksandr Syrskyi, currently the Commander of Ukrainian Land Forces, the senior military commander speaking to CNN said.
Syrskyi’s office has not responded to CNN’s attempt to reach him.
Despite the failure of Ukraine’s counteroffensive to make any significant progress in rolling back Russian forces in the south and the east of the country, Zaluzhny remains one of the most popular leaders in the country.
A poll published by the Kyiv Institute of Sociology in December found that 88% of Ukrainians supported the top general. Zelensky’s approval rating, though also high, was considerably lower at 62%.
The poll was conducted after differences between the two leaders had apparently emerged over the prosecution of the war.
“Just like in the First World War we have reached the level of technology that puts us into a stalemate,” Zaluzhny had expressed in The Economist in November as it became evident that Russia’s deeply-laid minefields and overwhelming heavy artillery fire had largely prevented significant Ukrainian success in the counteroffensive.
“There will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough,” but instead an equilibrium of devastating losses and destruction, the army chief added.
Those comments drew immediate criticism from the president’s office.
“If I were in the military, the last thing I would do is to comment to the press, to the public, on what is happening at the front [and] what might happen at the front…because then we will facilitate the aggressor’s work,” Ihor Zhovkva, deputy head of the president’s office, said on Ukrainian television at the time.
Zelensky did not openly criticize Zaluzhny, but told a live news conference in December: “I am waiting for very concrete things on the battlefield. The strategy is clear: We have an understanding of our actions. I want to see details,” Reuters reported.
View this interactive content on CNN.com
Launched in June, Ukraine’s counteroffensive was its main effort to drive Russian forces back from the territories they have occupied since 2022, particularly in the south of the country. Ukraine had aimed to push south from the town of Orikhiv towards the Sea of Azov, splitting Russia’s forces in two and cutting its land bridge to Crimea.
But Ukraine’s gains were modest. Its forces attempted to push from Orikhiv towards Tokmak, but only made it as far as Robotyne, a little over 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) south.
Ukraine’s lack of progress led to a call from its armed forces at the end of December for a huge mobilization effort of up to half a million new conscripts. The request is currently before parliament.
One soldier contacted by CNN currently fighting around Avdiivka in the east said any decision to dismiss Zaluzhny was a mistake.
“He is an honorable general. Our government wants to remove him because he is not very convenient for them,” the soldier said, adding, “It seems like ‘Zelensky’s guys’ sold us out a long time ago.”
