The time has come to benchmark Warhammer 40,000: Area Marine 2 with over 40 GPUs. The information is in, and we will now display you ways your GPU will carry out and if an improve is so as. Area Marine 2 seems to be a well-received recreation with most commonly certain opinions on Steam and reward from recreation reviewers. With a bit of luck, sinking extra hours than there are in a mean running week, throughout only a few days, to benchmark this recreation used to be price it.
This used to be in truth a captivating recreation to check, because it closely makes use of each the GPU and CPU, due to the insanely huge hordes of enemies made conceivable by means of the Swarm Engine, a proprietary recreation engine evolved by means of Saber Interactive for International Battle Z. This shall be a recreation we stock closely in our benchmark content material transferring ahead.
The segment of the sport we are the use of for trying out is especially CPU heavy. so in lots of circumstances, particularly with the higher-end GPUs, the sport is essentially CPU restricted. This is not unusual for Area Marine 2, so we are satisfied to benchmark one of the vital many huge battles. Do be aware that during different, much less tough sections of the sport, you may see a lot increased body charges than what we are reporting right here, as we intentionally centered a extremely tough segment for benchmarking.
For trying out, we are overlaying 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions the use of 43 GPUs, at the side of 3 high quality presets: Extremely, Prime, and Medium. Making trying out a little bit more difficult is the truth that the sport must be utterly reset when converting high quality presets. If now not, some settings may not follow, and the efficiency may not be correct. That mentioned, it is all the time perfect follow to reset video games between settings adjustments.
It used to be a little bit of a bother for our trying out as a result of each time we go out the sport, it hangs, and we need to wait round 20 seconds prior to having the ability to ALT+F4 it. It is a bit nerve-racking, and there are a couple of insects like this, which the developer says shall be addressed in a while with a patch.
There may be additionally no ray tracing or body era on this recreation, so the ones of you who’ve complained about an excessive amount of focal point on the ones applied sciences in video games like Megastar Wars Outlaws and Black Delusion: Wukong will definitely be happy. It is great to look a recreation that does not attempt to drive upscaling.
For trying out the GeForce GPUs, we used Recreation In a position Driving force 560.94, and for the Radeon GPUs, Adrenalin Version 24.10.37.10. Now we have additionally incorporated the Intel Arc A770 the use of driving force model 32.0.101.5989.
Take a look at Setup
CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cooling
be quiet! Natural Loop 2 FX 360mm
Motherboard
Gigabyte X670E Aorus Grasp [BIOS F32b]
Reminiscence
G.Talent Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5-6000 [CL30-38-38-96]
ATX Case
MSI Prospect 700R
Energy Provide
Kolink Regulator Gold ATX 3.0 1200W
Garage
TeamGroup T-Drive Cardea A440 M.2 PCle 4 NVMe SSD 4TB
Working Device
Home windows 11
Show Driving force
Nvidia Recreation In a position Driving force 560.94
AMD Adrenalin Version 24.10.37.10
Intel Arc 32.0.101.5989
Now let’s get into the knowledge…
Benchmarks
Extremely High quality 1080p Local
Beginning with the local 1080p information the use of the Extremely preset, we see that lots of the high-end GPUs are capped at round 110 fps, and that is with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Necessarily, the 7900 GRE or the rest quicker is CPU-limited beneath those stipulations. The 7800 XT used to be just right for 100 fps, which is excellent to look. Whilst we’re most effective at 1080p, that is local 1080p, so the consequences are respectable.
This additionally signifies that for 90 fps or higher, you most effective want a 4060 Ti or 7700 XT, and once more, that is with the sport maxed out visually. Even previous-generation mid-range portions, such because the RTX 3070 and 6800 XT, are handing over nicely over 60 fps.
For 60 fps or higher, the 7600/7600 XT will paintings, at the side of older fashions just like the 2070 Tremendous or 6700 XT. The RTX 4060 used to be 11% quicker than the 7600, which is handy, given it is also intended to price 11% extra.
The previous 5700 XT remains to be acting nicely with 55 fps on reasonable, making it 8% quicker than the RTX 2060 Tremendous and virtually 30% quicker than the RTX 3050. Intel’s Arc A770 is suffering right here with simply 38 fps, making it quicker than most effective the 6500 XT – and everyone knows how we really feel concerning the 6500 XT.
Extremely High quality 1080p Upscaling
With ‘High quality’ upscaling enabled – DLSS for the GeForce GPUs that beef up it and FSR for the entirety else – we discover a variety of GPUs which are ready to push just about the CPU prohibit. In reality, ranging from the RTX 3060 Ti and up, we’re rather closely CPU-limited. Even older portions, such because the RTX 2080 Ti, had been ready to render 100 fps. The 6900 XT averaged 102 fps, and the RTX 3090 used to be additionally closely CPU-limited.
Reaching 60 fps used to be quite simple, because the RTX 3050 controlled it, whilst the 5700 XT and 6650 XT each averaged 63 fps.
Extremely High quality 1440p Local
Expanding the answer to 1440p is helping alleviate the CPU bottleneck as fewer GPUs can render nicely over 100 fps the use of the Extremely preset. We discover the standard suspects on the best of our graph, and even if we anticipated the Radeon GPUs to scale higher with the CPU bottleneck, that does not appear to be the case right here. The 7900 XTX is infrequently gradual, despite the fact that, with 107 fps, and the 7900 XT matched the 4070 Ti.
The 7800 XT and RTX 4070 had been just right for round 80 fps, and for the ones happy with 60 fps, the 4060 Ti works, despite the fact that the 7700 XT used to be a lot better, hitting 75 fps. Beneath the 4060 Ti, efficiency begins to drop off, and prior to you realize it, we are within the sub-50 fps fluctuate. At that time, you will want to both decrease the standard settings or drop right down to 1080p.
Extremely High quality 1440p Upscaling
Enabling upscaling, which is basically some way of decreasing the answer, can dramatically spice up efficiency, even if the use of the High quality upscaling possibility. For instance, the 7700 XT positive factors an extra 13% efficiency, expanding from 75 to 85 fps. It is also conceivable to reasonable 60 fps with the 6700 XT, an 11% development that ends up in an additional 6 fps.
Extremely High quality 4K Local
At 4K, with out upscaling, issues get tricky for those GPUs. Even the RTX 4090 cannot render greater than 100 fps on reasonable, falling simply quick with 95 fps. Relatively strangely, then again, the 7900 XTX is the second one quickest GPU right here, rendering 77 fps, making it 15% quicker than the RTX 4080 Tremendous. In reality, the 7900 XT is in a position to fit the RTX 4080, whilst the GRE matched the 4070 Ti Tremendous, so the Radeon GPUs are acting extraordinarily nicely right here.
The 7700 XT is kind of matching the RTX 4070 Tremendous, and unbelievably, the 7600 XT may be matching the RTX 4060 Ti, albeit with simply 31 fps.
Extremely High quality 4K Upscaling
With High quality upscaling enabled, the 7900 XTX positive factors most effective an extra 17% in efficiency, making it slower than even the 4070 Ti Tremendous. It is because the 4070 Ti Tremendous noticed an enormous 63% efficiency building up with DLSS High quality enabled.
It sort of feels there is a computer virus with FSR within the recreation at this time, as efficiency with FSR is inconsistent. For instance, the Radeon RX 7600 XT noticed a cast 44% efficiency uplift with FSR enabled at 1440p, however at 4K, that margin is diminished to only 19%. My recommendation is to take the upscaling information with a grain of salt for now and as an alternative focal point at the local answer numbers.
Prime High quality 1080p Local
As soon as once more, a lot of the knowledge for the higher-end GPUs is CPU-limited, ranging from the 7900 GRE and up.
For round 100 fps on reasonable, the RTX 4060 Ti or, ideally, the 7700 XT plays nicely. From the RX 6800 to the 7600 XT, we see a vital drop in efficiency, with the RTX 3060, 2070 Tremendous, 6700 XT, and 7600 all averaging within the 70 fps fluctuate.
Rendering 60 fps with the Prime preset at 1080p is quite simple, or even the 2060 Tremendous handles it, at the side of the 5700 XT.
Prime High quality 1440p Local
Transferring as much as 1440p, we once more to find that efficiency is CPU-limited from the 7900 XT and up, despite the fact that you want to most likely come with the RTX 3090 sequence GPUs as nicely. The 7900 GRE achieves 100 fps, making it moderately slower than the 4070 Tremendous.
In the meantime, the 7800 XT and RTX 4070 are neck and neck at round 90 fps, with the 7700 XT averaging 82 fps, making it virtually 20% quicker than the 4060 Ti. Slightly under 60 fps, we discover the RTX 4060 and 7600/7600 XT, which might be most effective moderately quicker than the previous 2070 Tremendous and 5700 XT.
Past that, you are going to most probably wish to decrease the standard settings or answer.
Prime High quality 4K Local
At 4K, the CPU limits are got rid of, permitting us to watch the real GPU efficiency on the excessive finish. The 7900 XT and 4080 Tremendous are carefully matched, with the Radeon GPU being 4% quicker, whilst the 7900 XT is two% slower than the usual RTX 4080.
Past that, we drop nicely underneath 80 fps, with the 4070 Ti Tremendous averaging 69 fps, the 3090 Ti at 67 fps, and the 7900 GRE at 66 fps. Nonetheless, for a 60 fps revel in, the 7800 XT or 4070 Tremendous will carry out nicely.
Medium High quality 1080p Local
Decreasing the standard preset to Medium most effective advanced efficiency by means of 5-10% at 1080p, relying at the GPU. Alternatively, this used to be sufficient to push the RTX 4060 Ti previous 100 fps, a trifling 6% development from the Prime preset. Total, losing right down to Medium does not exchange a lot right here; a couple of extra GPUs spoil the 100 fps barrier, however on the low finish, efficiency stays most commonly the similar.
That mentioned, we incorporated the 4GB model of the 6500 XT, and the consequences are fascinating. The fps counter claims the 4GB style is 15% quicker than the 8GB style, which cannot be proper. Technically, despite the fact that, it’s – because the recreation does not paintings correctly at the 4GB card. Maximum textures are lacking, and the sport is totally damaged, with participant characters and recreation belongings disappearing completely. We’re going to display you what this seems like in a while.
Medium High quality 1440p Local
Even at 1440p, we are most effective seeing a minor efficiency development with the Medium preset in comparison to Prime. No longer a lot adjustments right here; for round 100 fps, the 7900 GRE or RTX 3080 will suffice. The RTX 4070 simply falls quick and is not a lot quicker than the 7800 XT. The 7700 XT clears 60 fps simply, with 88 fps on reasonable, which is spectacular in comparison to the 74 fps of the RTX 4060 Ti.
For round 60 fps, the RTX 4060 and 7600/7600 XT will suffice, despite the fact that efficiency from those current-generation, entry-level merchandise is not specifically spectacular, particularly bearing in mind they price $300.
Medium High quality 4K Local
At 4K, the RTX 4090 is just right for 110 fps, which is set the place the 7800X3D begins to restrict efficiency. The 7900 XTX is once more very spectacular with 93 fps, making it 15% quicker than the 4080 Tremendous. The 7900 XT used to be ready to check the 4080 Tremendous. The 4070 Ti Tremendous used to be on par with the 7900 GRE, whilst the 7800 XT and 4070 Tremendous had been related at round 60 fps. Past that, you will want to decrease the answer.
VRAM Utilization
The sport will alert you about inadequate VRAM on 8GB playing cards when the use of the Extremely preset, and whilst we did see VRAM utilization succeed in round 8GB, it by no means actually exceeded that during our trying out. That mentioned, it might in different sections of the sport, however according to this preliminary trying out, it sort of feels as despite the fact that 8GB of VRAM will suffice for Extremely settings.
So, 8GB playing cards continue to exist to struggle every other new AAA name. Alternatively, we aren’t shocked by means of this. Area Marine 2 is a decent-looking recreation, however the actual draw here’s the large battles, now not the breathtaking visuals. With that during thoughts, it is applicable that, for essentially the most section, texture high quality is somewhat deficient. Some textures glance ok – large, even – however many glance old-fashioned upon nearer inspection.
It is a disgrace, despite the fact that, as a result of with higher-quality textures, Area Marine 2 may be offering surprising visuals with out the will for ray tracing. It is also unlucky as a result of when you’ve got sufficient VRAM, higher-quality textures have little or no have an effect on on efficiency. Unfortunately, the ones 12GB, 16GB, and bigger VRAM buffers are being underutilized right here. This, in our opinion, is every other instance of ways VRAM stagnation has held again PC gaming. If 12GB had been the minimal or mainstream configuration, video games like Area Marine 2 don’t have texture high quality directly out of 2016.
Whilst 8GB is enough for this name, it is also roughly the minimal. Despite the fact that we did not check any 6GB fashions, now we have noticed experiences and proof that 6GB playing cards endure an identical problems to 4GB playing cards. Let’s check out that now.
Textures and Visible Comparability: 8GB vs 4GB
For reference, the video underneath displays how the sport appears the use of the 8GB model of the 6500 XT at 1080p with the Medium preset. Forget about the body price – it is nonetheless a 6500 XT – however that is how the sport will have to glance. In case you are questioning, that is precisely the way it appears the use of an RTX 4090, for instance. Whilst texture high quality is not superb, the extent of element is somewhat just right, the render distance is spectacular, and the selection of enemies is fantastic.
For a greater illustration of symbol high quality comparisons, take a look at the HUB video underneath:
Afterward you are going to see how the 4GB model of the 6500 XT seems like, and immediately you’ll be able to realize a couple of issues. Once more, that is 1080p Medium trying out. The nature style textures are very muddy, and this is applicable to the entirety. The large cannon not exists, many recreation belongings are lacking, and all NPCs – each supporting characters and enemies – are long past, that means the sport is clearly damaged.
Within the side-by-side comparability – if the former photos wasn’t transparent sufficient – with simply 4GB of VRAM, all of the enemies are lacking, and the crimson lasers are showing out of nowhere. Textures glance horrible, or even some constructions are lacking.
We additionally attempted decreasing the standard preset to Low, or even then, the sport used to be nonetheless damaged at the 4GB card. This photos is from the Low preset at 1080p with efficiency upscaling, and it appears horrible. Even right here, the enemies are nonetheless lacking. Only for amusing, we reduced the answer to 800×600 with efficiency upscaling nonetheless enabled, or even at this lowest conceivable environment, the sport remained damaged. So, for our 4GB pals, it is secure to mention it is time to improve.
What We Discovered
Total, Area Marine 2 is a great-looking recreation with intense horde battles. Despite the fact that most of the texture main points could make the sport glance a little bit dated when seen up shut, for this taste of recreation, it isn’t one thing that may trouble too many avid gamers. Alternatively, it is unlucky as a result of if the feel high quality had been increased, the sport can be visually surprising. We encountered a an identical factor with Black Delusion: Wukong, despite the fact that it sort of feels to be extra pronounced in Area Marine 2.
When it comes to GPU necessities, the sport is not excessive. The use of the Prime preset at 1440p, maximum GPUs can render over 60 fps, and in case you are satisfied to allow upscaling, the sport will have to be really easy to run. That mentioned, there seems to be a topic with FSR scaling, which will have to be addressed in a long term patch.
DLSS, however, used to be running beautifully. At 1440p the use of the Extremely preset with High quality upscaling, you’ll reach over 60 fps on an RTX 3060, or over 80 fps with the 3060 Ti, whilst the 4060 Ti used to be pushing 90 fps.
Remember that we’re trying out an excessively tough segment of the sport, so between the large battles, you might be prone to see a lot increased body charges. That is in large part because of the removing of CPU limits in much less intense scenes.
On that be aware, there is a just right likelihood your CPU, somewhat than your GPU, would be the proscribing issue on this name, particularly should you decrease the visuals on the lookout for increased body charges. Alternatively, we’re but to check a variety of CPUs with this name, so we aren’t precisely certain what the CPU scaling seems like.
Area Marine 2 is shaping as much as be a recreation we’re going to use for each CPU and GPU trying out for somewhat a while, so we’re going to be tracking any updates. Tell us what sort of efficiency you might be seeing and in case you are playing taking part in this recreation.
Buying groceries Shortcuts:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Tremendous on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Tremendous on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Tremendous on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX on Amazon
