Would you imagine a donation to fortify Weekend Reads, and our day-to-day paintings?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
Our checklist of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up previous 400. There are greater than 47,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now a part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Magazine Checker now incorporates greater than 250 titles. And have you ever noticed our leaderboard of authors with essentially the most retractions in recent times — or our checklist of most sensible 10 maximum extremely cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations Record — or our new checklist of papers with proof they had been written by way of ChatGPT?
Right here’s what used to be going down in different places (a few of these pieces is also paywalled, metered get admission to, or require loose registration to learn):
“Extra Research by way of Columbia Most cancers Researchers Are Retracted: The research, pulled as a result of copied knowledge, illustrate the sluggishness of clinical publishers to handle critical mistakes, mavens stated.”
“We’re in the midst of a virus of clinical fraud this is critically compromising analysis.”
A find out about reveals that “publications bringing up retracted articles had been extra regularly retracted.”
“If it’s the primary time you’ve noticed a truly bizarre paper get printed, I will see why it might seize your consideration.” However “it’s all type of mind-numbingly regimen at this level.”
“Once I see fields that don’t have as many retractions, I’m fairly positive that’s as a result of no person is having a look.” Two BBC appearances by way of our Ivan Oransky (beginning at ~46:00) and right here at ~40:00.
“Reaction to: ‘Dangerous bibliometrics don’t upload up for analysis or why analysis publishing coverage wishes sound science.’” The tension saga continues.
“UCLA Punished a Outstanding Scientist for ‘Harmful and Damaging Habits.’ She Says It’s ‘Unjust Persecution.’”
“Stanford Math-Training Skilled Has ‘Reckless Fail to remember for Accuracy,’ Grievance Alleges.”
“Visitor opinion: Clinical fraud places Utah youngsters’s protection in danger.”
“The Newest ‘Disaster’ — Is the Analysis Literature Overrun with ChatGPT- and LLM-generated Articles?”
“Loss of experimentation has stalled the talk on open peer evaluate.”
“Is AI in a position to mass-produce lay summaries of analysis articles?”
“Finishing profiteering from publicly-funded analysis: Tackling the educational publishing oligopoly.”
“$160K Libel Verdict for Ex-Scholar In keeping with Professor’s Analysis Misconduct Allegations.”
“Drug corporate and previous director are convicted of filing falsified knowledge to MHRA.”
“Superconductor Scientist Engaged in Analysis Misconduct, Probe Reveals.”
Our Ivan Oransky seems at the Unleashed podcast.
“An Influential Economics Discussion board Has a Troubling Surplus of Trolls.” A tale on criticisms at the web page in 2016.
“Teachers boycott Wiley gender magazine after ‘anti-woke’ shift.”
“The aspiring rector who wrote 4 paragraphs and cited himself 100 instances.” Our protection from 2022.
What’s e-newsletter integrity, “why does it topic, how it’s safeguarded and how may we do higher?”
“Tracking AI-Changed Content material at Scale: A Case Find out about at the Affect of ChatGPT on AI Convention Peer Critiques.”
“Universities wish to forestall hiding from analysis integrity issues,” says the editor in leader of Science. We and others agree.
“Player Fraud in Digital Qualitative Substance Use Analysis.”
“Retracted analysis papers no longer a priority, says deputy minister.”
“David as opposed to Goliath: Early profession researchers in an unethical publishing device.”
“Washington Per 30 days publishes Israeli creator’s coexistence piece retracted by way of leftist literary magazine Guernica.”
Like Retraction Watch? You’ll be able to make a tax-deductible contribution to fortify our paintings, subscribe to our loose day-to-day digest or paid weekly replace, apply us on Twitter, like us on Fb, or upload us in your RSS reader. When you discover a retraction that’s no longer in The Retraction Watch Database, you’ll tell us right here. For feedback or comments, electronic mail us at crew@retractionwatch.com.
Similar
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-2183501031-287bb34536994beebb5a7568616cbfe6.jpg "Dow Jones These days: Shares Prolong Put up-Election Rally as Fed Cuts Passion Charges; S&P 500, Nasdaq Shut at File Highs")
