Pricey RW readers, are you able to spare $25?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
Our listing of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up previous 450. There are greater than 50,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now a part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Magazine Checker now accommodates greater than 300 titles. And have you ever noticed our leaderboard of authors with essentially the most retractions in recent years — or our listing of most sensible 10 maximum extremely cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations Listing — or our listing of just about 100 papers with proof they have been written via ChatGPT?
Right here’s what used to be going down in other places (a few of these pieces is also paywalled, metered get entry to, or require loose registration to learn):
How “a snappy and grimy direction to raised have an effect on numbers—are on the upward push.” Our investigation with Science.
“Learn about retracted years after it activate an notorious COVID-19 remedy scandal.” It’s the second-most cited retracted paper ever.
“It speaks best of her that she self-identified what took place than if she had pretended it didn’t occur.” A case of misconduct.
“The Grimy Trade of Monkey Laundering,” a documentary about analysis lab providers.
“Eastern researchers shocked to be told they co-authored papers with North Korean scientists.”
Retired researcher David Bimler — aka Smut Clyde — “has launched into a moment profession: exposing fraudulent analysis.”
What may educational publishing appear to be in 2030? 2035?
“Will ChatGPT Get Tenure?”
“Students Are Intended to Say When They Use AI. Do They?”
“My mind begins to die when I attempt to learn a magazine article.”
“Main overseas journals might face rising festival for submissions and readership from rising Chinese language titles.”
“But when social scientists do now not paintings onerous to test that their conclusions are true, and do now not prohibit themselves to what may also be justified on that foundation, they too are within the faux information trade.”
“Instructional writing is getting tougher to learn—the arts maximum of all.”
“That’s why, in a dialogue paper printed this month, the United Kingdom Analysis Integrity Place of work (UKRIO) argues that analysis misconduct investigations will have to, so far as imaginable, use impartial language.”
“The mistakes are so glaring and important that editorial forums from JAMC and PNAS will have to retract either one of those papers to forestall the additional misuse of a fatally mistaken dataset” about losses from storm injury, argues Roger Pielke, Jr.
“Can novelty rankings on papers shift the facility dynamics in medical publishing?”
“U.S. science investment businesses roll out insurance policies on loose get entry to to magazine articles.”
“Easy methods to proportion science with the general public when your analysis is secret.”
“Analysis Misconduct within the Age” of AI. And the “Double-Edged Sword of AI in Analysis Misconduct.”
“The Direction Is About Literature. Its Textbook Used to be Generated via AI.”
“Do we want a accept as true with credit score company in scholarly publishing?”
“Publicity of Instructional Misconduct and Universities’ Innovation Output” from retractions in China.
“Issues over loss of oversight for privately funded analysis” in Canada.
“Sage acquires the medical and scientific writer Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.”
eLife pronounces partial feed to Internet of Science, however received’t exchange publishing type following lack of have an effect on issue.
Analysis facilities at college “experimented on folks – with out permission.” A hyperlink to our earlier protection.
“Ethics of posthumous scholarly authorship within the sciences.”
“AI-authored abstracts ‘extra original’ than human-written ones.”
“In Reward of Peer Evaluation” from a magazine editor.
Analysis student information grievance towards college school “for ‘misconduct.’”
“At the (ab)use of particular problems in scholarly journals.”
“Large find out about reveals untrustworthy trials pollute gold-standard scientific opinions.”
“Paris declaration to spearhead combat towards faux science.”
“The Untold Thriller of Rogue RA,” a comic book strip.
Like Retraction Watch? You’ll be able to make a tax-deductible contribution to improve our paintings, apply us on Twitter, like us on Fb, upload us in your RSS reader, or subscribe to our day by day digest. If you happen to discover a retraction that’s now not in our database, you’ll be able to tell us right here. For feedback or comments, electronic mail us at [email protected].
Sign up for my Mailchimp target market
Through clicking post, you conform to proportion your electronic mail deal with with the web page proprietor and Mailchimp to obtain advertising and marketing, updates, and different emails from the web page proprietor. Use the unsubscribe hyperlink in the ones emails to choose out at any time.
Processing…
Good fortune! You are at the listing.
Whoops! There used to be an error and we could not procedure your subscription. Please reload the web page and check out once more.
Similar
